Page 37 - April_2024 Broucher.indd
        P. 37
     Kalyan Kolukuluri
    Title: Adverse health shocks, social insurance and household consumption: evidence from Indonesia’s
    Askeskin program
    Journal: International Journal of Health Economics and Management
    This study examines the efficacy of Askeskin, a subsidized social health
    insurance targeted towards poor households and informal sector workers in
    Indonesia, in mitigating the impact of adverse health shocks on household
    consumption. To overcome selection bias from non-experimental nature
    of Askeskin enrolment, I use a robust estimation strategy, where outcome
    regressions are run on a propensity score-based matching sample. Using
    longitudinal data from the Indonesia Family Life Survey, this study finds that
    uninsured households facing extreme health health shocks experience a
    1.3% point loss in growth in food and 2% point loss in non-food consumption
                                                               growth.   Importantly,   households    having   Askeskin
                                                               insurance, are fully insured in terms of food and medical
                                                               consumption.  But  non-food  spending,  a  discretionary
                                                               component, is not insured fully resulting in a 1.2% point
                                                               fall in consumption growth rate, despite Askeskin. This
                                                               result is robust to a battery of sensitivity and robustness
                                                               checks, including alternate definition of health shocks.
                                                               Further, I investigate whether the Askeskin program simply
                                                               displaced informal, community-based mechanisms of
                                                               risk sharing. No crowd out effect is observed and informal
                                                               risk-sharing coexists with Askeskin.
     Page 30





